I dont think bank size has much to do with whether you win or not. Perhaps you are taking more risks and should reduce those, aim for a lower profit until you build the bigger bank you desire.
You have a point, but bank size is the main problem for me. I am taking more risks, the pressure of outside things means I have too. Once I get a bit of stability, that will hopefully change, but I've not had that stability bank-size wise, for months now. That's how I made 27k last year, fresh mindset, nothing to lose etc.
An example of how things can change rapidly - view the above Australian Profit and loss screen-shot and look at some of the wins between the 17th - and 23rd of April on the 'Super Rugby' Union matches. That's the period when I found myself using a bank size of 500 pound + (albeit temporary). This is how things went last year consistently, and how it should go again once I start using 1k+ as a Betfair bank. I know exactly how to profit on markets like the handicap markets on the Rugby. This is why I keep going on about bank size issues. It's very frustrating.
youre betting on too many markets, you cant be research all those sports, its as though you believe if you fire off enough bets then you should eventually finish on top, you wont, cut down and specialise, until you do this you wont get anywhere.
bank size doesnt matter, if you turn a profit with a bank of £10 then you should turn a profit with a bank of £100,
Hi, I know how to profit as I've done it before this way. I'm ok betting on all those sports (with a few exceptions). Bank size is my main issue at the moment.
You have been told many times, if you have an edge then a tiny bank will grow. Your obsession with bank size isn't healthy as you dont seem to have faith in your abilities to grow a small bank up.
I think you need to take a step back and evaluate. You keep saying about you know because you've done it before, but that was a small sample of 1 period last year, how do you know your succesful period wasn't the unusual and the losing run is the norm? Also, what happened in the snooker? Surely your losses weren't on the midas-based frame betting?
I dont think bank size has much to do with whether you win or not.
ReplyDeletePerhaps you are taking more risks and should reduce those, aim for a lower profit until you build the bigger bank you desire.
You have a point, but bank size is the main problem for me. I am taking more risks, the pressure of outside things means I have too. Once I get a bit of stability, that will hopefully change, but I've not had that stability bank-size wise, for months now. That's how I made 27k last year, fresh mindset, nothing to lose etc.
ReplyDeleteAn example of how things can change rapidly - view the above Australian Profit and loss screen-shot and look at some of the wins between the 17th - and 23rd of April on the 'Super Rugby' Union matches. That's the period when I found myself using a bank size of 500 pound + (albeit temporary). This is how things went last year consistently, and how it should go again once I start using 1k+ as a Betfair bank. I know exactly how to profit on markets like the handicap markets on the Rugby. This is why I keep going on about bank size issues. It's very frustrating.
ReplyDeleteyoure betting on too many markets, you cant be research all those sports, its as though you believe if you fire off enough bets then you should eventually finish on top, you wont, cut down and specialise, until you do this you wont get anywhere.
ReplyDeletebank size doesnt matter, if you turn a profit with a bank of £10 then you should turn a profit with a bank of £100,
hth
Hi, I know how to profit as I've done it before this way. I'm ok betting on all those sports (with a few exceptions). Bank size is my main issue at the moment.
ReplyDeleteYou have been told many times, if you have an edge then a tiny bank will grow. Your obsession with bank size isn't healthy as you dont seem to have faith in your abilities to grow a small bank up.
ReplyDeleteI think you need to take a step back and evaluate. You keep saying about you know because you've done it before, but that was a small sample of 1 period last year, how do you know your succesful period wasn't the unusual and the losing run is the norm? Also, what happened in the snooker? Surely your losses weren't on the midas-based frame betting?
ReplyDelete